May 2004
VOLUME 14, NUMBER 5

 

Extension continues to feel budget cut pains

By Vicky Boyd

The Grower, February 2004

Although the national economy is slowly recovering, states continue to suffer budget deficits, prompting further funding cuts at all levels.

Cooperative Extension is no exception. During the past fiscal year, Cooperative Extension programs throughout the country took big budget hits, forcing them to eliminate positions, freeze hiring and/or call for early retirement. And the trend seems to be continuing.

As its name applies, Cooperative Extension is a cooperative effort among the federal, state and county governments. States fund salaries for researchers, county agents and farm advisors, and counties provide the support personnel.

Depending on the state, counties may also provide vehicles, supplies and travel expenses. Typically, the U.S. Department of Agriculture provides matching funds to the county and/or state funding.

In Yakima County, Wash., for example, the county commissioners recently cut 10 percent of Extension’s budget, moving that money to the coroner’s and assessor’s departments. The move eliminated the budget for printing, travel, telephones and other basic services within Extension.

Another dire situation is occurring in Monterey County, Calif., known as the nation’s salad bowl for its leafy green, lettuce and other cool-weather crops. Both county and university budgets were cut 25 percent for fiscal year 2003-04, and early indications show even more dramatic cuts for 2004-05.

The county is being asked to demonstrate how it would restructure to meet a 60-percent budget cut. Such a cut would leave funds for only one support person compared to the six the county Extension office had in 2002-03.

A recent Monterey County farm advisor newsletter spells it out: “This position could not possibly support the seven [farm] advisors and the research staff and would significantly impact the advisors’ ability to conduct research, offer education programs, and provide services to the agricultural industry, to our youth and to the community at large.”

Although many Extension programs are looking to private industry to help make up some of the shortfall, private industry also has been hit with lackluster revenues caused by—until recently—a stagnant farm economy.

As lawmakers go into the next legislative sessions, they need to hear from the beneficiaries of the programs just how important they are.

One of the challenges with Extension is many lawmakers believe it’s only the growers and producers—and possibly 4-H members—who benefit. But Extension is far ranging, and consumers, including lawmakers, also benefit from programs, such as improved integrated pest management practices, new variety development, and diet and nutrition programs.

 


RETURN TO MAY VEGETABLE PRODUCTION AND MARKETING NEWS