Scientists,
Growers Assess Trade-offs
In Use of Tillage, Cover Crops and Compost
By Louise E. Jackson, Irenee Ramirez, Ron Yokota, Steven
A. Fennimore, Steven T. Koike, Diane M. Henderson, William E. Chaney,
and Karen M. Klonsky
Soil quality research focuses on soil organic
matter (SOM), its activity and function, and related chemical and
physical properties. It also considers the larger picture, including
impacts of soil management on production, pests, and economics.
Use of cover crops, compost, and reduced tillage may increase SOM,
especially the active fraction of SOM that is largely composed of
decaying plant material and microbial cells, and plays an important
role in nutrient cycling and retention. These methods may also increase
nutrient availability, leading to less reliance on fertilizers that
are derived from non-renewable fossil fuel, and improve soil physical
properties such as aeration and water infiltration. They can improve
soil quality by minimizing nitrate leaching below the root zone
and reducing groundwater contamination.
Adoption of these practices will be enhanced if: (1) farmers face
few economic disadvantages due to the new procedures; (2) the start-up
costs and effort are feasible; and (3) new practices do not result
in onset of new problems. In this on-farm research, farmers participated
in the design and implementation of experiments to assess the multiple
trade-offs involved in transitioning to new management practices.
In an on-farm experiment in a vegetable production field in the
Salinas Valley, a multi-disciplinary approach was used to evaluate
responses to tillage and organic matter (OM) management. Conventional
tillage (sub-soiling, disking, and surface mulching to a depth of
20 inches) was compared to minimum tillage where only the surface
layer of semi-permanent beds was tilled to a depth of 8 inches.
Also, organic amendment (+OM) and no organic amendment (-OM) treatments
were compared. Organic matter was added to the soil in the form
of both cover crops and compost, to incorporate carbon (C) and nitrogen
(N) sources, like plant residues, that are readily available to
plants, and more resistant sources of C and N that remain after
the composting of manure, municipal yard waste, and other plant
materials.
Many conventional and organic vegetable growers use both inputs
in their crop rotations, and so these materials were used together
to study their effects on SOM and other variables. Soil microbial
biomass is one measure of the readily available, active fraction
of SOM, and it usually represents < 5% of the total C and N in
the SOM. Total soil C and N contain many diverse compounds that
are resistant to breakdown in soil, and typically change more slowly
in response to management than the active fraction of SOM.
The objectives of the 2-year experiment were to determine the effects
of alternative tillage and OM management practices by: (1) monitoring
changes in crop yield, nutrient uptake, and soil parameters throughout
a 2-year period; (2) documenting effects on weeds, pathogens, and
insect pests; and (3) assessing the total economic costs and net
returns incurred while adopting practices conducive to increasing
soil quality.
Use of cover crops and compost increased soil quality in irrigated,
intensive production of lettuce and broccoli in the Salinas Valley.
These methods had the beneficial impacts of increasing soil microbial
biomass, increasing total soil carbon and nitrogen, reducing surface
bulk density and decreasing the potential for groundwater pollution
as a result of nitrate leaching below the root zone. These soil
benefits did not lead to lower yields and occasionally resulted
in fewer weeds and lower lettuce corky-root disease. Although surface
minimum tillage reduced yields, it led to reduced potential for
nitrate leaching below the root zone. Use of conventional tillage,
cover crops, and compost produced high vegetable yields and acceptable
net economic returns over a 2-year period, but broccoli was more
profitable than lettuce under this regime. Understanding the trade-offs
of various costs and benefits will help growers choose management
practices that optimize economic and environmental benefits.
|